LECTURE GIVEN BY GARY WADE ON SEPTEMBER 25, 1999 AT THE
RIFE CONFERENCE HELD IN EDMONTON , ALBERTA, CANADA
By Gary Wade
(This lecture has been modified and lengthened for the internet presentation May 6, 2000)
In this article:
1)
Microbe / parasite targets which are rampant in the environment.
2)
Mechanism and method of microbe destruction.
3)
Needed Equipment to accomplish task.
4)
Experimental techniques
5)
Suggested lethal ultrasound frequencies
Microbe / parasite targets which are rampant in the environment
The parasitic microbes / parasites listed in 1a) and 1b) are fairly common throughout much of the world. Humans are quite susceptible to all of these microbes / parasites and regularly contract infections of one or more of them. In general you can think of multiples of tens of millions of people and or animals currently infected with each listing of 1a) and 1b). Rife type technology can dispose of these microbes / parasites easily and quickly. Let us move quickly to end this needless suffering. Pick several microbes you would like to find the lethal ultrasound frequencies for.
Lists 1a & 1b
1a) Water Supply Microbes / Parasites
Hookworm, Whipworm ( Trichuris Trichiura )
Protoza - Cryptosporidium, Giardia, Ameba (Entamoeba Histalytica)
Flukes - Fasciala, Paragoniums, Heterophyes, Schistosoma,
Metagonemus, Alaria, Opisthorchis, Dicracoelium
1b) Pet and Live Stock Microbes / Parasites
Hookworm (Ancylostoma Canibum), Roundworm (Toxocara Canis,
Toxo cara Cati), Pinworm (Enterobius Vermicularis), Dog Heartworm
(Dirfilaria Immitis)
Trichinosis (Trichinella Sprirais)
Protoza - Toxoplasma gondii, Isospora, Pneumocystis, Dientamoeba,
Chilomastix, Sarcocystis, Balantidium, Cryptosparidium,
Babesia, Retortamonas, Neopora caninum, Trichomanas
vaginalis, Giardia, Aegieria, Acanthamoeba, Entamoeba
gingivalis, Entamoeba histolytica
Tapeworms - Taenia saginata, Cyticercosis, Taenia solium, Diphyllo-
bothrium latum, Dipyiidium caninum, Hymenolepsis
nana, Hymenolepsis diminuta
Flukes - Fasciola, Paragonimus, Heterophyes, Schistosoma,
Metogonemus, Alaria, Opisthorchis, Dicrocoelium
Spirochetes - Spirochaeta, Saprospira, Cristispira, Treponema,
Treponema palladium
Mechanism and method of microbe destruction
About half the viruses that infect plants and animals have a outer coat
(capsid) which has an intrinsic geometry as illustrated in
Figures 1A and 1B.
In animals the outer coat (capsid) of the virus is also covered with a bi-lipid
layer obtained from the 
infected
host cell from which the virus budded off of. Other virus types that will not
be talked about here have analogous or similar symmetries and periodisities
which make them also susceptible to easy disruption and distruction from
specific frequencies of ultrasound.
In Figure 2A
the black dots represent spheroid shaped large single protein molecules.
Usually two or more types of protein spheroids make up the virus capsid coat.
These large protein olecules are deformable and are elastic in nature. Figures
2B and 2C 
illustrate
the periodically spaced, elastically coupled, closed on themselves protein clump
structures that are formed when Figure 2 is folded into an icosahedral of Figure
1B.
When real viruses of the structural type as illustrated in Figure 1B are
in living tissue they are deformed into spheroids. This is due to the
interaction of the virus capsid with the environment. The bi-lipid coat on the
surface of the capsid has an affinity with water and this tends to deform the
capsid into a sphere with tension on its surface. The capsid and its outer coat
form a simi- permeable membrane and the phenomena of osmotic pressure causes the
capsid to expand and be under tension. There are other hydrophobic and
hydrophilic reactions that can cause and contribute to capsid deformation.
Figures 3A through F illustrate this situation.
The bonds between adjacent protein molecules in the virus capsid coat
are generally hydrogen bonds and these are relatively weak chemical bonds. To a
first approximation, we can treat each protein clump (molecule) in the capsid
coat as a simple harmonic oscillator as illustrated in Figure 4C. Imagine in
Figure 4C that
the center of mass is a steel ball. Imagine that that steel ball has two
elastic cords attached to it and that the cords are attached to the ceiling and
floor respectfully. And furthermore, the elastic cords are under some tension.
Now imagine that 
the
ball is pulled back and then released. The ball will oscillate back and forth
at some constant frequency. If the tension is now increased in the cords and
the ball is again pulled back and let go, the ball will again oscillate back and
forth at a constant frequency, but now at a higher frequency.
In fact, the frequency of oscillation will vary approximately proportional to the square root of the tension in the cords for small displacements from equilibrium of the ball. If the ball is exposed to some small rythmic driving force of the same frequency of oscillation that is natural for the mass of the ball and the tension in the cords present, then the amplitude (displacement from equilibrium) of oscillation will increase until the energy release into the surrounding environment by the motion of the ball and cords per oscillation cycle equals the energy being supplied per cycle by the rhythmic force. However, the larger the amplitude (displacement from equilibrium) of the oscillation, the larger the stress on where the elastic cords are attached.
If the cords are not well secured to the ceiling or floor, the cords may decouple before the system goes into equilibrium with the rhythmic driving force. In the case of the periodically spaced, elastically coupled, and closed-on-themselves virus capsid sub-structures seen in Figure 4A, the "floor " and "ceiling" connections are weak hydrogen bonds between adjacent protein clumps of the virus capsid. Figure 4E illustrates the most stressful standing wave oscillation mode on a ten member protein clump ring. In this oscillation mode, adjacent protein clumps are oscillating 180 degrees out of phase, that is, as one protein clump is moving upward from its equilibrium position, the adjacent clumps are moving downward and visa versa. This type of oscillation mode puts maximum tension / stress on the weak hydrogen bonds holding the protein clumps to each other. At some relatively small displacement amplitude, the hydrogen bonds will fail and the ring /capsid coat will disintegrate. Rife observed viruses exploding like little hand grenades when they were exposed to their mortal oscillation rate (MOR).
Figures 5B, C, and
D illustrate several standing wave oscillation modes that a ten member
protein clump ring can support. Maximum stress / tension occurs at the location
of standing wave nodes and the weakest regions on the protein clump ring is
where the clumps bond together with mainly hydrogen bonds. That is
approximately half way 
between
adjacent protein clump centers of mass. Therefore, we see that the oscillation
modes illustrated in Figures 5B and D are very destructive where as that of 5C
is only marginally destructive.
Figures 6A and B
illustrate two more very simple virus capsid coats. By following the
instructions and building the capsid coat models, you can see how many types of 
periodically
spaced, closed-on-themselves protein clump structures you find and also how many
overlapping and tangential closed protein clump structures you can find.
Needed Equipment to Accomplish Task
a) Microscope with TV camera
b) B & K 10 MHz sweep function generator
c) VCR with time readout on video tape capability
d) Sweep controller box (see Alteronics below)
e) Ultrasound transducer that mounts on microscope stage (see Alteronics
)
f) TV monitor
g) 20 MHz oscilloscope (optional)
Alteronics - Equipment available from Alteronics (1-530-589-4926). Ask about their new combination sweep function generator and controller box unit built for just this type of experimental research.
A great deal of very useful work can be done at relatively low
magnification (~400 power) when dealing with one cell animals and multicell
parasites. However, when trying to find the lethal ultrasound frequencies for
bacteria much higher power is needed (1,200 to 2,500 power) and some special
light staining technique such as Rife used are very helpful and definitely
needed for good research results (finding the lethal ultrasound frequencies).
Experimental Techniques
Figure 7A
is the conceptual flow chart for carrying out the experimental research. The
intensity (energy / area / time ) of ultrasound output of the piezoelectric
transducer of Figure
7B is a very non-linear function of the peak to peak voltage of the driving
voltage signal. The intensity increases to the fourth power of the peak to
peak driving voltage. For example, if the peak to peak voltage of a sine wave
driving voltage is doubled, the sine wave pressure wave output intensity is
increased by a factor of 16 = (2)(2)(2)(2).
It is only the sine and cosine voltage wave forms which are transformed into
cosine and sine wave pressure waves respectfully (see
Figure 8). All
other voltage wave forms are transformed by the piezoelectric transducer into
another type of wave form. For example, a voltage triangle wave form is
transformed into a pressure square wave form by the piezoelectric
transducer
(see Figures 9A and B).
All commercially available piezoelectric transducers have an effective cut off frequency above which they can not produce significant and generally useful ultrasound output. The best commonly available PZT piezoelectric transducers that I use, begin to quickly lose their ultrasound producing ability a little above 12 MHz. To get around this shortcoming, there is a trick. That is, to use a voltage triangle wave form at a frequency below the cut off frequency of the piezoelectric material being used and use the hidden higher frequency ultrasound components in the generated pressure square wave to kill the microorganisms. Figure 9C, D, and E illustrate the first three hidden Fourier components in the pressure square wave of Figure 9B which was generated by the transducer being supplied with the voltage triangle wave form of Figure 9A.
Figure
10A and Figure10B 
show
the power absorption / power radiated verses frequency curves for some
mechanical resonators / oscillators. The curve of Figure 10B where b=bo is a
more realistic looking shape for real viruses, which are in general the easiest
structures to destroy due to their high symmetry. Everything stated in the
caption of Figure 10A still holds true, only it is more obvious in Figure 10B.
Here are the technical details for implementing the experimental setup shown in the flow diagram of Figure 7A, in order to kill specific microbes.
Examples of scanning technique
1) The controller box going from 0 to +10 volts in time T and connected to VCG input on a B & K sweep function generator set to 10 MHz.
For our purposes, we need to know the relationship (the particular equation) between frequency (F) and time (t) in the experimental run when the controller box voltage starts at 0 volts and linearly progresses to +10 volts in time T. Refer to Figure 11.
F = M t + B
F = First variable, M = Slope of line, t = Second variable,
B = F axis intercept
(Frequency) (Rise / Run) (time)
Run = t2 - t1, Rise = F2 - F1 , M = (F2 - F1) / (t2 - t1)
In
Figure 11, F1 = 10 MHz, F2 = 2 MHz, t1 = 0, t2 = T. Using these values we
obtain
M = (- 8 MHz / T). Substituting in initial values of frequency and time ( 10
MHz and 0) into our straight line equation above we obtain:
F = ( - 8 MHz / T ) t + 10 MHz
What this last equation tells us is that once you place the total time (T) for the scan into the equation you can find the frequency of the generator at any specific time t. So using the time (t) readout on the video camera / VCR you can determine the frequency at which the microbe disintegrated (died).
2) Controller box voltage output going from +10 volts to 0 volts in time
T. See Figure 12. 
Using the same procedure as before we obtain:
F = ( + 8 MHz / T )
+ 2 MHz
Suggested Lethal Ultrasound Frequencies
Let us first deal with cancer. If cancer is suspected, it is important not to kill off a tumor too quickly. If large amounts of tumor are killed off, you now have a bacterial feeding ground which can lead to toxemia which in turn can lead to kidney and liver failure. So, if the suspected cancer you have is susceptible to specific frequencies of ultrasound, as the great majority of cancers were in Dr. Royal Raymond Rife's time, you should consider perhaps one treatment cycle every two or three days giving the body adequate time to deal with the kill off. However, if you live in California or some other "progressive" state which prefers their citizens not to think too much for themselves, you must ignore this entire last paragraph, despite my constitutional rights of free expression.
Under California law (AB 1707.1) "The sale, offering for sale, holding for
sale, delivering, giving away, prescribing or administering of any drug,
medicine, compound or device to be used in the diagnosis, treatment, alleviation
or cure of cancer is unlawful unless (1) an application with respect thereto has
been approved under Section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
or..." .
In California, you are only allowed to treat cancer with 1) whole body poisoning
chemotherapy which heavily damages the immune system and is sometimes
carcinogenic in nature, 2) X-Ray radiation which is massively carcinogenic in
nature, and 3) disfiguring and disabling surgery.
Your health and well being in California are, for all practical purposes, of
very low priority to law makers. In my opinion, the law makers are a
combination of dupes and PAC whores of the vested pharmaceutical / AMA interests
of the main stream allopathic establishment. Under the guises of public health
and safety, the allopathic medical establishment have (under the law)
effectively taken away much of your control over your own body and the right to
choose your own health / illness care treatment. The average chemo and
radiation "doctor" makes well over two hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year
for what in my opinion is essentially quackery. The cancer industry in the U.
S. is a two hundred billion dollar a year business. It is time to take back
what is rightfully ours by changing the laws. Our state and ferderal
legislative bodies need to do what the Legislative Assembly of Alberta, Canada
did in May 1996 when they got fed up with their allopathic medical
establishment. Here is the paragraph they added to their law books.
" A registered practitioner shall not be found guilty of unbecoming
conduct or be found to be incapable or unfit to practice medicine or osteopathy
soley on the basis that the registered practitioner employs a therapy that is
non-traditional or departs from the prevailing medical practices, unless it can
be demonstrated that the therapy has a safety risk for that patient unreasonably
greater than the prevailing treatment."
Is this not a common sense, honest, and intelligent way to practice medicine and give 'We the People' safe, effective medical treatment options? Are your state legislative representatives capable of writing a bill that would put this paragraph on our law books and give 'We the People' the medical treatment options we need, but are currently denied to us by vested, monopoly like interests? We need a bill that covers all licensed health care professions.
Since, I am not a allopathic medical doctor, I can not give you medical advice under the law in California and many other states. So what follows is in no way to be considered medical advice. It is only I, Gary Wade, excersizing my right of free verbal and written expression under the Constitution of the United States of America. As a practical matter, if you wish to experiment on yourself to see if you can kill off a cancer tumor on yourself, you will need a piezoelectric transducer, possibly a controller box, and a standard sweep function generator used by electronic technicians. Get a sweep function generator that has a four digit LED readout (a 10 MHz B & K unit will do). There are over a dozen ultrasound equipment manufactures in the US. The ultrasound transducers from any of these manufactures will do.
However, the best and cheapest piezoelectric transducer available is from
Alteronics listed above. Also, Alteronics has a cheap and reliable
controller box available. There are several experimental treatment protocols
you can try. First, you can simply slowly scan through the full frequency range
of the sweep function generator while on the triangle wave setting, using the
controller box. The function generator is set to maximum output voltage and is
always of a positive polarity. Secondly, you can slowly scan through and around
either 11,780,000 or 23,560,000 cycles per second ( one or both of these
frequencies were used by Rife to kill the BX cancer virus). This is achieved by
using hidden Fourier components of 11,780,000 or 23,560,000 cycles per second.
For example, looking at the equation associated with the pressure square wave in
Figure 9, we see the second hidden Fourier frequency component has a frequency
of 11,780,000 cycles per second, if the triangle voltage wave frequency coming
from the function generator is:
(11,780,000 cycles per second) / 3 = 3,926,666 cycles per second. Similarly,
the second hidden Fourier component is 23,560,000 cycles per second, if the
triangle voltage wave form has a frequency of 7,853,333 cycles per second. So,
by slowly scanning through these lower triangle voltage wave form frequencies,
the hidden Fourier higher frequency pressure sine waves are generated.
The third experimental protocol is perhaps the most interesting. It has been found empirically by several independent researchers that a pressure square wave of 2127 cycles per second can quickly destroy many types of cancer tumors. However, as stated earlier, you do not want to kill off a tumor to quickly. A conservative treatment approach that has achieved successful results is as follows: Running the function generator at maximum output, place the transducer on or near the tumor for one minute. Then wait three days to see if the kill off was O.K. or too big ( very painful inflammation of tumor tissue). If O.K. continue treatment . If, not then wait until all this subsides before treating yourself again. When treating yourself again use one half the treatment time used before. Again, wait a couple of days to see how big the kill off was.
It is best to kill off the cancer in small amounts over two or three months. This will allow the liver and kidneys to do their jobs without making the body toxic. Large amounts ( 5 to 10 grams) of vitamin C can be taken daily with lots of water (minimum of 10 oz. per gram of vitamin C) to detox. A buffered vitamin C is probably best for most people. However, do not use a buffered vitamin C with calcium in it. This form of vitamin C seems to promote cancer growth.
The actual mechanism that kills the cancer cell when using the 2127 cycles per second pressure square wave is not known. However, my quess is that one or more of the Fourier pressure wave components hidden in the 2127 cycle pressure square wave closely matches the mechanical resonance frequency of one or more of the cell's specific ion gates. Cancer cells have very abnormal ion concentrations in them. If ion gates for specific ions are opened up by these Fourier components the ion concentrations can be changed drastically inside the cancer cell and the bi-lipid membrane potential difference can fall drastically. If this potential difference fall is too large the cell can not recover and dies.
Documents 1 and 2 are photo copies of actual Rife research note book pages. A set of approximately twenty 24 such pages were supplied to me by Jasson Ringas. Table 1 is a compilation of the key frequency data for the microbes listed in those 24 pages.
In table 2 are listed some of the standard disease treatment frequencies used by voltage square wave generators, such as those made by John Crane. When electrodes are used on the body, which have voltage square waves applied to them, these voltage square waves among other things produce discontinuous steady state ion transport in the body electrolytic fluids. This discontinuous steady state ion transport produces sets of pressure square waves that have the full spectrum of relative phase differences, but all centered about the same frequency.
These pressure square waves have the same center frequency as the driving /
applied voltage square wave. And just as indicated in Figure 9 there are many
hidden Fourier higher frequency components in the pressure square wave. Using
voltage square waves to produce pressure square waves in body fluids is very
inefficient. However, by using a voltage triangle wave put into a piezoelectric
transducer, much more powerful pressure square waves can be produced.
Therefore, using voltage triangle waves of the same frequency as listed in Table
2, we can expect much quicker and dramatic results. By using the formula given
with Figure 9, you can use a standard sweep function generator and using the
sine wave output function to see which hidden Fourier frequency(ies) are
actually responsible for the dramatic results often seen.
Voice / Fax # 626-303-7714.
